Micca COVO-S vs. Presonus Eris E3.5

Micca COVO-S Compact 2-Way Bookshelf Speakers Presonus Eris E3.5 3.5” Near Field Studio Monitor
$80 $100
Dimensions (H × W × D)
5.10” × 4.20” × 5.10”
130mm × 107mm × 130mm
10.24” × 7.00” × 7.68”
260mm × 178mm × 195mm
Power Type
Passive Powered
Frequency Response
90-20,000 Hz 80-20,000 Hz
ASR Score
n/a 1.5
ASR Score w/Subwoofer
n/a 4.3

Key Takeaways

TLDR Summary: In the realm of budget-friendly sound, the Micca COVO-S speakers dazzle with their compact form and co-axial design, delivering a surprisingly coherent soundstage from a small footprint. Their performance, while respectable at their price point, tends to favor midrange clarity over deep bass response. Meanwhile, the PreSonus Eris E3.5 studio monitors offer a more balanced, accurate sound profile well-suited for budding audio producers. With woven composite drivers and detailed acoustic tuning, the Eris E3.5 provides a flat response for critical listening. Both serve distinct audiences: the COVO-S for casual listeners and the Eris E3.5 for audio precision enthusiasts.

Speaker Comparison

When it comes to outfitting a small room or workspace with sound, audiophiles and casual listeners alike grapple with picking out the perfect set of compact speakers that promise to deliver quality without commandeering desk real estate. In the fray of options, two contenders stand out for their size and sound: the Micca COVO-S Compact 2-Way Bookshelf Speakers and the Presonus Eris E3.5 3.5” Near Field Studio Monitor. Both have their merits and potential drawbacks, and today we'll pit them against each other in an audiophile's showdown to see which might be the right fit for your auditory adventures.

Design and Build Quality

The Micca COVO-S speakers exude a no-nonsense aesthetic with a modest footprint that is remarkably space-efficient. Their small, angular design allows them to fit into tight spaces with ease. The black wood grain finish is unobtrusive and functional, making them a reliable choice for those who favor utility over flash. On the flip side, the Presonus Eris E3.5 speakers take a slightly more professional stance in appearance with a sleek, matte black finish and blue speaker cone that adds a pop of color. They're built to be sturdy, with a heft that inspires confidence in their longevity and a design that feels at home in both casual and professional settings.

Micca COVO-S Compact 2-Way Bookshelf Speakers
Micca COVO-S arrow (at Amazon.com)

Sound Quality and Performance

When it comes to sound, the Micca COVO-S speakers are a surprise packet in a small package. Their sound signature leans towards the warm and smooth, with coaxial drivers that manage a balanced presentation, given their size. They're particularly adept with midrange frequencies and have a polite, unassuming bass that won't overwhelm. In contrast, the Presonus Eris E3.5 monitors aim for clarity and accuracy, characteristic of studio monitors. They offer a flat frequency response with more pronounced detail, particularly in the upper mids and highs, and a tighter bass response that provides a more articulate rendition of low-end sounds.

Connectivity and Usability

Functionality-wise, the Micca COVO-S keeps it straightforward; these are passive speakers requiring an external amplifier to bring them to life. This could be seen as a benefit for users who already have an amp and want to tailor their audio experience with different components. The Presonus Eris E3.5, however, serves up a more plug-and-play approach, being active monitors with built-in amplification. Notably, these speakers also provide convenient front-panel controls for volume and a handy aux input for direct device connection—features conducive to ease of use and immediate gratification.

Presonus Eris E3.5 3.5” Near Field Studio Monitor
Presonus Eris E3.5 arrow (at Amazon.com)

Both sets of speakers offer unique advantages depending on the listener's needs. The Micca COVO-S is ideal for those who enjoy the process of tweaking and fine-tuning their setup with different amplifiers and sources. They're also a solid choice for users on a tight budget. Meanwhile, the Presonus Eris E3.5 would be the go-to for budding producers, podcasters, and anyone who appreciates studio monitor precision. They're particularly suited for those who value straightforward operation with minimal equipment clutter.

The Verdict

Ultimately, choosing between the Micca COVO-S and the Presonus Eris E3.5 comes down to intended use and personal preference. Casual listeners and those dipping their toes into the vast ocean of hi-fi might lean towards the Micca for its ease of integration into a home system. Conversely, the Presonus is likely to appeal to those with a keen ear for detail and a need for professional-grade monitoring on a smaller scale. Both sets of speakers articulate a compelling case for space-saving audio without compromising on quality, but they cater to different segments of the audio enthusiast market.

In the final analysis, it's clear that whether you're looking to fill your personal space with rich, room-friendly sound or require the precision and detail of near-field studio monitoring, there's a compact speaker set out there that ticks all the right boxes. The Micca COVO-S and the Presonus Eris E3.5 each have their own sonic personalities and practical benefits. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize the simplicity and warmth of the Micca's sound or the professional clarity and function of the Presonus. Whichever you choose, rest assured that great sound can indeed come from small packages.

Check Current Prices:

Micca COVO-S Compact 2-Way Bookshelf Speakers
Micca COVO-S Compact 2-Way Bookshelf Speakers
Presonus Eris E3.5 3.5” Near Field Studio Monitor
Presonus Eris E3.5 3.5” Near Field Studio Monitor

Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Disclaimer: the speaker data listed on this website are correct to the best of our knowledge, but we do not guarantee the accuracy of the data. Please double-check any measurements with the manufacturer before making a final purchasing decision.